Back to Void
Void, Invasion #287

Exact printing

Void — Invasion #287

Sorcery

INV · #287 · Rare · En · Foil and nonfoil · separate price fields

Exact-print market

Price and trust

Pricing ConfidenceLow Confidence
Exact-print NeoPrice$0.547-day moveRoughly flat

Market trustUpdated Sep 29, 2026

Exact-print market · Representative · Foil and nonfoil · separate price fields

Marketplace Comparison

Compare source coverage

Source agreement: Marketplaces do not agree

Marketplace prices may represent different finish or condition coverage. Check the source listing before comparing.

Source prices are 1.89x apart.

Supply

Supply and condition coverage

Updated Not tracked

Inventory is not tracked for this exact printing yet.

NM, LP/SP, and MP/HP tracked. Seller and listing counts are tracked for the print overall, not separately by finish or condition.

Exact-print history

Price & inventory history

INV #287 · Selected version

Price and inventory history for this printing may combine available finishes.

Loading market history...

Other printings

Other printings

Prices, supply, and confidence can differ substantially by exact version.

2 printings
Advanced market dataOpen

Detailed metrics

NeoScore
9
F Tier
Organic demand
0
Thin organic demand
Card rules & legalityOpen

Choose a number. Destroy all artifacts and creatures with mana value equal to that number. Then target player reveals their hand and discards all nonland cards with mana value equal to the number.

Mana cost
{3}{B}{R}
Color identity
B, R
Reserved List
No
Released
Oct 2, 2000
Legal formats
Duel, Penny, Predh, Legacy, Modern, Vintage, Commander, Premodern, Oathbreaker
Sources, methodology, and disclosureOpen

NeoPrice and Pricing Confidence use the existing NeoCardAlpha methodology. CardTrader is the inventory source, TCGplayer is the primary pricing source, and Card Kingdom is validation-only.

NeoCardAlpha may earn a commission from certain marketplace links.

Card Kingdom retail validation is visible when a matching product is available, but it remains a validation source.