Back to Staff of Nin
Staff of Nin, Commander 2017 #224

Exact printing

Staff of Nin — Commander 2017 #224

Artifact

C17 · #224 · Rare · En · Nonfoil only

Exact-print market

Price and trust

Pricing ConfidenceModerate Confidence
Exact-print NeoPrice$1.29Tracked copies94

Market trustUpdated Sep 30, 2026

Exact-print market · Representative · Nonfoil only

Marketplace Comparison

Compare source coverage

Source agreement: Marketplaces do not agree

Marketplace prices may represent different finish or condition coverage. Check the source listing before comparing.

Source prices are 3.22x apart.

Supply

Supply and condition coverage

Updated Not tracked
Tracked copies94Print-level inventory
NM34Near Mint
LP/SP56Lightly/Slightly Played
MP/HP4Moderately/Heavily Played

NM, LP/SP, and MP/HP tracked. Seller and listing counts are tracked for the print overall, not separately by finish or condition.

Exact-print history

Price & inventory history

C17 #224 · Selected version

Price and inventory history for this printing may combine available finishes.

Loading market history...

Other printings

Other printings

Prices, supply, and confidence can differ substantially by exact version.

4 printings
Advanced market dataOpen

Detailed metrics

Market sensitivity
Low Sensitivity (0/100)
How easily this print market could move
NeoScore
9
F Tier
Organic demand
0
Thin organic demand
Card rules & legalityOpen

At the beginning of your upkeep, draw a card. {T}: This artifact deals 1 damage to any target.

Mana cost
{6}
Color identity
Colorless
Reserved List
No
Released
Aug 25, 2017
Legal formats
Duel, Penny, Legacy, Modern, Vintage, Commander, Oathbreaker
Sources, methodology, and disclosureOpen

NeoPrice and Pricing Confidence use the existing NeoCardAlpha methodology. CardTrader is the inventory source, TCGplayer is the primary pricing source, and Card Kingdom is validation-only.

NeoCardAlpha may earn a commission from certain marketplace links.

Card Kingdom retail validation is visible when a matching product is available, but it remains a validation source.