Back to Rats of Rath
Rats of Rath, Tempest #150

Exact printing

Rats of Rath — Tempest #150

Creature — Rat

TMP · #150 · Common · En · Nonfoil only

Exact-print market

Price and trust

Pricing ConfidenceModerate Confidence
Exact-print NeoPrice$0.277-day moveRoughly flatTracked copies986Sellers127

Market trustUpdated Sep 28, 2026

Exact-print market · Representative · Nonfoil only

Marketplace Comparison

Compare source coverage

Source agreement: Marketplaces do not agree

Marketplace prices may represent different finish or condition coverage. Check the source listing before comparing.

Source prices are 3.44x apart.

Supply

Supply and condition coverage

Updated Sep 28, 2026
Tracked copies986Print-level inventory
Listings208Active print-level listings
Sellers127Distinct tracked sellers

NM, LP/SP, and MP/HP tracked. Seller and listing counts are tracked for the print overall, not separately by finish or condition.

Exact-print history

Price & inventory history

TMP #150 · Selected version

Price and inventory history for this printing may combine available finishes.

Loading market history...
Advanced market dataOpen

Detailed metrics

Liquidity
Deep
Score 85.0
Spread
69511% spread
Stable
Market sensitivity
Low Sensitivity (16/100)
How easily this print market could move
Inventory trend
-1.2%
24h -1.2% | 7d -2.0%
NeoScore
47
D Tier
Organic demand
47
Weak organic demand
Card rules & legalityOpen

{B}: Destroy target artifact, creature, or land you control.

Mana cost
{1}{B}
Color identity
B
Reserved List
No
Released
Oct 14, 1997
Legal formats
Tlr, Duel, Predh, Legacy, Pauper, Vintage, Commander, Premodern, Oathbreaker, Paupercommander
Sources, methodology, and disclosureOpen

NeoPrice and Pricing Confidence use the existing NeoCardAlpha methodology. CardTrader is the inventory source, TCGplayer is the primary pricing source, and Card Kingdom is validation-only.

NeoCardAlpha may earn a commission from certain marketplace links.

Card Kingdom retail validation is visible when a matching product is available, but it remains a validation source.